A concise sociological framework that helps connect four centuries of American racial history into one coherent story.
Dr. Gerardo Martí – August 18, 2026 (re-printed with permission)
A history teacher once asked me a question that has stayed with me. “Why,” she wondered, “does every generation think it has finally solved America’s racial problems, only to discover that another set of conflicts has emerged?”
The question reveals a common way of thinking about American history. We tend to divide the past into distinct chapters. Slavery belongs to one era. Jim Crow belongs to another. The Civil Rights Movement marks a dramatic turning point. Black Lives Matter is treated as a contemporary controversy. Each appears to be its own story.
Sociologists ask a different question. Instead of asking whether one era has replaced another, we often find social arrangements that endure, even as laws, institutions, and public language have changed.
That shift in perspective introduces one of sociology’s most useful concepts. Sociologists call it a racialized social system.
Racism Is a Way Societies Organize Opportunity
Eduardo Bonilla-Silva first developed the term nearly three decades ago to describe societies in which economic, political, social, and even psychological rewards are distributed along racial lines. His point was both simple and profound: Racism is not merely a collection of individual prejudices. It is a way that societies organize opportunity. Racism becomes embedded in institutions, neighborhoods, schools, labor markets, housing, wealth, criminal justice, and political participation. When individuals make choices, they make those choices within systems that have histories of their own.
Bonilla-Silva’s work built upon an earlier insight developed by Michael Omi and Howard Winant. They demonstrated how race is not a fixed biological reality but an ongoing political and social accomplishment. Through what they called racial formation, governments, organizations, movements, and everyday interactions continually redefine what race means and how it matters.
A key point is that race is neither invented anew each generation nor frozen forever. It is continually reconstructed through institutions. Taken together, these ideas encourage us to stop thinking of racism primarily as something people possess and start thinking of it as something societies produce.
That perspective changes how we read American history.
The Successive Regimes of Racial Inequality
One slide that I often use in teaching presents a pedagogical model rather than a definitive historical periodization. It identifies four successive “regimes” through which racial inequality has been organized. I chose these for their general familiarity among students: these are chattel slavery, Jim Crow, the Civil Rights era, and the most recent period shaped by Black Lives Matter.
It is not that these eras are perfectly discrete or universally accepted by scholars. The point is to help others recognize that societies preserve similar patterns of inequality while changing the institutional mechanisms that produce them.
The first regime relied upon slavery. Property law made racial domination explicit. Human beings could be bought, sold, inherited, and legally controlled. Resistance — especially widely reported (and therefore pervasively feared) slave revolts — was answered through increasingly restrictive slave codes that limited literacy, movement, and collective gatherings.
After emancipation following the Civil War, the legal foundation of enslavement disappeared. Yet the broader racial order did not vanish. New institutions emerged that intentionally encoded racial hierarchy and control. Segregation statutes, voter suppression, debt tenancy, and racial terror became mechanisms through which racial hierarchy continued under different legal conditions. Reconstruction promised a more democratic future, but that promise was met with organized reaction and the gradual consolidation of Jim Crow.
Jim Crow applied to racial groups other than African Americans, such that Chinese and Mexican Americans, for example, where also subject to Jim Crow imperatives.
The Civil Rights Movement fundamentally transformed American law. Brown v. Board of Education, the Civil Rights Act, and the Voting Rights Act are among the strongest federally enforced decisions that dismantled formal segregation and expanded democratic participation. Those achievements cannot be minimized. Yet sociologists also ask: What happened after formal racial exclusions became illegal?
A stream of research from American sociologists, especially from W.E.B. Du Bois and Oliver Cromwell Cox, then the racially aware research of the 1960s and 1970s, and then the greater span of research among Asian, Latine, and Indigenous communities, repeatedly demonstrated that racial inequality did not disappear but became organized through different institutional arrangements. Suburbanization, “law and order” politics, and prison expansion are examples of those changing mechanisms.
The contemporary period, represented here under the label of Black Lives Matter, reflects another shift in public conversation. Rather than concentrating primarily on individual prejudice, the movement directs attention toward policing, incarceration, and inherited wealth. Whether one agrees with every claim advanced by activists is a separate question. Sociologically, what matters is that public debate has increasingly focused on institutions rather than intentions. Predictably, this reframing has generated its own forms of resistance, including arguments that structural analyses themselves are divisive or discriminatory.
The simple framework offered here does not suggest that history repeats itself. Nor does it imply that every reform has failed. The abolition of slavery mattered. The Civil Rights Movement mattered. Contemporary resistance matters now. Every expansion of democratic rights has mattered enormously.
The sociological insight is that institutions rarely disappear overnight. They adapt. When one mechanism of allocating opportunity and privilege becomes politically or morally untenable, another finds a way to emerge. Terminology and forms of expression change. The legal framework changes. The organizational practices change. The underlying struggle over power, resources, and full belonging continues.
Institutional Change Requires Discernment
As someone who studies congregations, I find this perspective indispensable. Churches often understand racial justice primarily as a matter of personal reconciliation. Those relationships are essential, but organizations also possess cultures, routines, leadership structures, and histories that shape ministry long after individual attitudes have changed.
Congregations that I admire are those willing to examine themselves institutionally. They ask who belongs, who leads, whose history is remembered, whose voices shape decisions, and which neighborhoods receive sustained investment. Those are organizational questions, not only moral ones. They require more than goodwill. They require institutional learning.
Of course, the same lesson extends beyond congregations. Teachers can help students see connections across historical periods instead of presenting racial history as isolated episodes. Parents can encourage children to think about how institutions evolve as societies change. Small business owners can examine how hiring, promotion, mentoring, and community partnerships reflect organizational habits that may have developed over many years.
One of the main contributions of sociology is to reveal patterns that individual events often obscure. Understanding the idea of a racialized social system does not tell us what policies to support or what political conclusions to reach. It does give us a richer vocabulary for understanding why racial inequality has proven so persistent, why institutional change is often contested, and why every generation inherits both the accomplishments and the unfinished work of those who came before.
Once we begin to see this, the recurring debates over race become less surprising. They become part of a larger story about how societies change, how institutions adapt, and how democratic communities continually renegotiate who belongs and on what terms.
Join our LEARN Community to access Dr. Marti’s seminars American Blindspot Book Talk and American Legacies of Oppression.
Connect with Dr. Gerardo Martí
For more on Dr. Martí’s work, follow him on Bluesky and subscribe to his Substack: American Blindspot: Race, Religion, Power, and Social Change.
Recent Comments